Post by naeem10 on Feb 15, 2024 4:27:48 GMT -6
The false, non-truthful information that has been heard in Ferreras ' conversations with Villarejo is of extraordinary gravity for a democratic system. "False evidence is fabricated, with police officers paid by everyone, to destroy a politician and his party, with the excuse of alleged patriotism." Such practices represent a frontal attack on our Constitution, specifically, article 20. 1. Rights are recognized and protected. a) To freely express and disseminate thoughts, ideas and opinions through words, writing or any other means of reproduction. d ) To freely communicate or receive truthful information by any means of dissemination .
Will stop at the concept of truthful information, although I have already done so in a previous article, but due to its importance I will do it again. The freedoms of expression and information are not always easily distinguishable, but it is necessary to qualify them to make the constitutional mandates fully operational: freedom of expression refers to the freedom to Bahrain Email List communicate thoughts, ideas, opinions by any means of dissemination, whether of a general or more restricted (billboards...). For its part, freedom of information refers to the communication of facts through any means of general dissemination , that is, freedom of expression carries a subjective nuance , while freedom of information contains a meaning that is intended to be objective.
Evidently, expression and information are often not given separately, but, on the contrary, united since with the news it is common to intersperse the informant's own opinions . In this way it will be considered that we are facing a manifestation of freedom of expression or, on the contrary, freedom of information in accordance with the predominant nature of the message. The constitutional precept requires truthfulness in the case of information , which has been interpreted as the need for subjective truthfulness, that is, that the informant has acted diligently, has contrasted the information in an appropriate manner to the characteristics of the news and the available means (as different constitutional rulings have pointed out) since if an objective truth is required that would make the exercise of freedom of information impos
Will stop at the concept of truthful information, although I have already done so in a previous article, but due to its importance I will do it again. The freedoms of expression and information are not always easily distinguishable, but it is necessary to qualify them to make the constitutional mandates fully operational: freedom of expression refers to the freedom to Bahrain Email List communicate thoughts, ideas, opinions by any means of dissemination, whether of a general or more restricted (billboards...). For its part, freedom of information refers to the communication of facts through any means of general dissemination , that is, freedom of expression carries a subjective nuance , while freedom of information contains a meaning that is intended to be objective.
Evidently, expression and information are often not given separately, but, on the contrary, united since with the news it is common to intersperse the informant's own opinions . In this way it will be considered that we are facing a manifestation of freedom of expression or, on the contrary, freedom of information in accordance with the predominant nature of the message. The constitutional precept requires truthfulness in the case of information , which has been interpreted as the need for subjective truthfulness, that is, that the informant has acted diligently, has contrasted the information in an appropriate manner to the characteristics of the news and the available means (as different constitutional rulings have pointed out) since if an objective truth is required that would make the exercise of freedom of information impos